Reduce Fire Sprinkler Costs With This Alternative

Using passive fire protection may mean you can jettison fire sprinklers. This new publication provides the details.

According to the Fire Protection Research Foundation, the median cost of a residential sprinkler system is $5,000, but the maximum cost of a system averages $21,000. Those are huge numbers that contribute to the builder’s total cost of construction. Builders may be able to cut their overall costs for sprinklers by using fiberglass and mineral wool insulation as an effective, affordable passive fire protection solution in concealed spaces and ceiling cavities in low-rise buildings and one and two-family dwellings. NAIMA has released a new publication detailing the new provisions of the 2019 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 13 on when sprinklers may be omitted.Sprinklers Piece-2

Fiberglass and Mineral Wool as Passive Fire Protection

Fire protection in building codes includes three primary elements: detection, suppression, and containment. Balanced fire protection design blends fire detection (e.g., fire alarm systems) with active fire suppression (sprinkler systems) and passive measures such as fire-resistive building materials, like fire blocking, firestopping, fire-rated floors, walls, and doors. Fiberglass and mineral wool insulation can also be used as passive fire protection systems because they are noncombustible materials that can contain or slow the spread of fire.

Fiberglass, rock and slag wool insulation are ideally suited for passive fire protection and are a flexible, low-cost alternative to sprinkler systems in concealed spaces where fire and smoke could otherwise progress through a building. NAIMA’s guide contains an overview of when and where sprinklers may be omitted and how the space must be built to comply with NFPA  Standard 13 requirements. The publication also details how sprinkler piping may be protected using fiberglass and mineral wool insulation in unconditioned areas.

Builders should have their design reviewed and approved by a knowledgeable design professional and a local building official to ensure compliance with local codes and standards.


Photo by rawdonfox

1 Comment on "Reduce Fire Sprinkler Costs With This Alternative"

  1. Gary Lewis | March 28, 2019 at 2:50 pm |

    I guess it’s okay to post affiliate articles, but I’m not certain this one is on point. First, there can be no such thing as a ‘maximum’ ‘average’ cost….that is a mathematical impossibility if there is more than a single data point. Second, the use of insulation in IRC basement ceilings of engineered lumber is not yet an approved alternative to either sprinklers or a gyp board or wood underside finish. Third, the 2019 NFPA standard will not likely see incorporation into the I-codes for several more years at least. Lastly, for one-and-two family and low-rise residential, the applicable NFPA sprinkler standard already exempts many concealed combustible areas from requiring sprinkler protection. Perhaps a bit more ‘balanced’ approach to the reporting is in order.

Comments are closed.